Popular Posts

Search This Blog

Showing posts with label Casey Anthony. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Casey Anthony. Show all posts

Thursday, October 27, 2011

Casey Anthony-No Book Deal. No Boycott?

To the next person whose comment I use for a post I will send a free signed book!  (If you post as "anonymous" for convenience, try to include an identifying website or name in your remark so no one else can claim your prize!)  For an example, please click here

Please let me know your thoughts now. The comment function should be working, but if it "eats" yours, please send me your comment at: a s u d d e n s h o t (at) gmail dot com and I will gladly post it for you. 


    * * * * * * * * * * 

You know who this is.



TMZ is reporting that it has obtained strong statements from three of the biggest corporations in publishing that they have no interest in offering a book deal to Casey Anthony.  This is good news to most of us.  At the time of her astonishing acquittal, many had a fear approaching mania that through book deals she would become a millionaire off the suspicious death of her baby daughter. However, during radio interviews at the time, I urged a look at the real business of publishing instead.

In the not too distant past, publishing dynamo Judith Regan lost her literary empire by mistakenly believing a book by also acquitted O.J. Simpson would be a good idea. She not only lost her job but her entire imprint and her career in publishing over that fiasco. Judith Regan was a strange and foreign thing amongst publishers: she was a real risk taker. Now that she's been banished from their ranks, I would be hard pressed to name another.  When the fear of Casey's imminent riches-through-authorship burst into the national zeitgeist on the 4th of July, I well remembered O.J. and his affect on Judith Regan. I did not think many publishers would be willing to repeat that experiment in career hari kari.

Furthermore, publishing had changed since then. It is much, much tougher for anyone to get a book deal nowadays. Publishers are more risk-averse than ever.

Now TMZ is confirming that the biggest publishers are beginning to go on the record that Casey Anthony, whose bella vita began when her little girl's ended, is not welcome to join their rosters of authors.   This is a relief to all.  (Except perhaps my friend the lovable private investigator who has an almost pathological belief in the innocence of defendants. He told me in regards to Casey's case, "we have to start with the assumption that mothers don't kill their children." Really? Really???!!  Sigh. We love him anyway. Hire him--he will believe in you.  I promise. )

This leads me to the misguided boycott of true crime author Diane Fanning. Sometimes I get people coming to this blog seeking the answer to the question, does Casey Anthony make money from Jeff Ashton's/Diane Fanning's book?   The answer is an unequivocal NO. In order to write about a person, it is not  necessary to pay them for permission. If you had to do that, how does everybody on the internet get away with writing about everyone else, including about Casey Anthony?

Diane Fanning.  Photo from press release.


To the argument that writing a book like Ashton's or Fanning's is "blood money" let me say I understand your rage about the sickening death of this precious child. Many, many people express their rage over it by writing--in comment trails, on their blogs, on Facebook, on Twitter, and in their boycott manifestos.  Some people happen to be professional writers, trained to gather and verify facts and to develop them into a readable narrative.  Most true crime writers that I know write these books because they are also expressing their rage over crime. True Crime genre queen Ann Rule has a legion of fans, most of whom swear she has changed their lives in some way, educating them about the harmless seeming stranger or the over flattering suitor. The rest of us have our fans, too, and we touch lives. My books have resulted in donations to victims of crime and supported such things as Silent Witness.  I read Diane's book and it helped me--and thousands of others--join the national dialogue by laying out research I was unwilling to do myself because doing so is a full time job. 

Nobody who worked on the Casey Anthony case did so for free, except, murkily, Jose Baez and some of his team. No one who attended to Casey's needs in jail (guards, doctors, cooks, etc.) did it for free. The judge was paid, the prosecutors were paid, the stenographers were paid.  These people were all paid because they provide a service and are professionals who have met certain standards and are accountable. Book writers fit that category just as much.

To those people who sincerely believe that there is some blood money connection between books about crime and the criminals who commit the crimes, I hope this post helps clear up the misunderstanding. I know you have lots of things to do and it's not your job to know how a book is put together.  That j.o.b. is mine.

And Diane Fanning's.


If you followed the Casey Anthony case, you may also be interested in the #MarjorieOrbin case
A devoted father....
A happy little boy....
A woman with a chainsaw...







Tuesday, August 30, 2011

Jeff Ashton's Book Cover

Looks like publisher HarperCollins scrambled through the weekend to get a cover together for the Jeff Ashton book.  Here it is.



I knew it would have photos of the two of them, fascinating antagonists that they are: the scholarly, science-boy jurist at the end of his highly accomplished career and the confabulating high school dropout club-maven just embarking on life.  Their images are famous enough to carry the book cover through (although I wouldn't be surprised to see the design change again before publication. See "crashing a book" post below) though the design is simple and I know he will get great sales.

Authors do obsess about their book covers and this is a moment for me to say I confess the team at Penguin did a better job on mine. She* is famous (see 48 Hours: Diary of a Showgirl, and ID Deadly Women) but my cover, in my humble opinion, is more artistic, more intriguing.

*"She" = Marjorie Orbin, convicted dismemberment killer

FAQ: Is that really Marjorie Orbin on the cover? (scroll down half a tic to see)
Answer: Certainly! That photo was taken at the Maricopa County Jail while Marjorie talked to me. I am sitting just inches from her, on the freedom side of the steel grid. You can see both of us at the same grid here and compare to cover. Many more pics related to Marjorie Orbin on this site. Just click the tag below.

Camille Kimball's books:

Friday, July 8, 2011

Live, it's Saturday Night...Talk About Casey Anthony on KTAR

Casey Anthony has shocked the nation with her success in a Florida court. I'll be on the radio Saturday evening talking about it with KTAR personality Jay Lawrence.

casey anthony awaiting sentencing zippo kluv getty photo by joe burbank pool getty images Casey Anthony Not Out Of The Woods Yet

As a crime author and longtime journalist, I go to trials all the time. I have my opinions about this one.

Trouble is, I think Jay has a different opinion about the Casey Anthony verdict than I do. What do YOU think? Join us: teach one of us a lesson, him or me!

Stream it live if you are not in Phoenix (and most of you aren't!). Call in.

KTAR.com
92.3 FM Phoenix
7pm (10p in New York)
Saturday July 9
Add: Click here to see the pics Jay & I took during the show.

After the show, continue the conversation on Facebook. Time always runs out on the radio! You are most welcome to join my personal page. Share your thoughts after the show.

Thursday, July 7, 2011

You Are Not a Voyeur

1-cain-abel.jpg
Cain Slaying Abel


The nation has been riveted to the Casey Anthony case this week and Dr. Gregory Jantz doesn't like it. I saw his column on the Huffington Post and found myself reacting aloud to the computer screen. Dr. Jantz says those of us watching the investigation into the disappearance of 2 1/2 year old Caylee and the trial of her mother, Casey, are like citizens of ancient Rome: bloodthirsty, detached and eager to thrust our thumbs down on the life of another human being. Jantz says we need to "take back our individual humanity."

As a writer of true crime books, my world is filled with victims of crime, defendants, and with the people Dr. Jantz would liken to bloodthirsty Romans, the readers. Let's do the first two first. The victims of the crimes in my books have hugged me, thanked me, brought me deep into their lives. Public attention, from my books and other media, has made them feel their suffering did not go unnoticed, that the world cares. Defendants have been flattered by the attention and grateful to have a voice which, as Americans, we never deny to anyone, especially when one's liberty is at stake. If there is any innocence still on the table for defendants, the bigger the audience, the more chance for new witnesses to come forward.

Now, as for the readers, Dr. Jantz claims they have become "removed from the terrible truth" of the death of a little child.

Nothing could be further from what I know as the real truth. The most basic function of humanity is life. Our earliest story, in the Western tradition, is the creation of life followed very quickly by the taking of life, when Cain slew Abel. Further East, the ancient story of Gilgamesh is deeply concerned with questions of life and death, civilization and assignment of responsibility.
Gilgamesh and Enkidu fighting Humbaba

Gilgamesh and Enkidu with Humbaba

Now that we are in the 21st century, thousands of years after these stories, civilization has not changed. We are still humans with a primal interest in life and death, and the every day struggle to create "civilization," that thing that drives us to find someone responsible when murder strikes and to protect other victims from the same malevolent mayhem.

I say when we tune into the Casey Anthony case, we are hearing the ancient cry of Abel and of Gilgamesh: death is fearsome, make this right, help us make a better civilization. We are Enkidu, the wild man, feeling the savage brambles of our lost barbarism scratch at our heels and threaten to drag us back in.

I can make a direct connection from Casey Anthony's case to this desire to push back our brutish tendencies and create civilization. Within hours of the young woman's acquittal on all charges relating to little Caylee's actual death--murder, manslaughter, child abuse--I saw internet petitions circulating asking to create a law making it a felony to fail to report the death of a child within one hour. By the time I saw it, it already had 50,000 signatures.

This, to me, is the real answer as to why people are following the Casey Anthony case. It is our deep desire as humans not to have murder in our midst. It is encoded in our collective mentality as a species, unfortunately termed "groupthink" by Dr. Jantz, to see to the survival of the next generation. Nothing could tap into our spiritual and genetic foundations more profoundly than the face of a sweet toddler, hideously cast into a swamp.

And that, I say, says something very good about us, it is the very opposite of making us sleazy "voyeurs."


I have many more thoughts on this topic and will post a companion essay shortly.
ADD--it has now been posted. Someone making you feel guilty about your interest in Casey Anthony or any other case? Try this answer.

Monday, July 4, 2011

Sweat Lodge, Casey Anthony and Miranda

Interesting the little quirks you find from court to court. Judge Belvin Perry just remanded the Casey Anthony jury to their deliberations, saying the five alternates would be chosen back there in the rooms to which they would momentarily retire.

About two weeks ago, I watched with interest from a back row seat while Judge Darrow in Yavapai County Arizona made a very formal exercise of having the alternate jurors in the James Ray (The Secret) sweat lodge trial chosen completely at random, numbers drawn from a hat, in open court. He made sure the attorneys had an opportunity to inspect the hat, which both sides declined.

Judge Warren Darrow allowed recordings from the retreat to be played in court after the defence argued they should remain private
Yavapai County Superior Court Judge Warren Darrow presiding over the sweat lodge trial


In at least one other high profile trial I've been to in Arizona, but in a different county, it was an open secret that the selection of the alternates was not random, at all. Although done in open court, jurors who had given glimpses along the way of bad behavior (forming opinions, sleeping in court, etc.) were the ones who magically became alternates and did not participate in the final verdict.

Interesting to see Judge Perry, who has been a great stickler for courtroom procedure (I wouldn't want to be Matthew Bartlett, would you?), had no qualms about having the alternates chosen behind closed doors.

I guess the takeaway is that law is a matter of constant evolution in this country, even in these small matters. From trial to trial, the varying personalities involved bring different opinions about what the law means and what justice requires. So, in Judge Darrow's courthouse with the magnificent views, justice is very concerned with the selection of alternate jurors. In Judge Perry's Florida courthouse, alternates are more a matter of administration than of justice. I suppose one day you could see a supreme court challenge and then every U.S. courthouse would have to use the same standard, a la the Miranda warning. This little matter of the alternate juror lottery gives a digestible object lesson in how law works in this country.

The Miranda warning, by the way, was an Arizona case. And one of the lawyers with a direct link to it, was kind enough to offer up some legal insight to readers of this blog in regards to the James Ray case.


Monday, June 27, 2011

Casey Anthony Filing About Death Penalty

Lawyers for Casey Anthony have just asked the judge to save her from the death penalty by invoking an Arizona case. Have you heard Vinnie Politan from InSession talking about the Ring case in Arizona?

Well, it's a very famous case in Arizona. An armored car carrying cash--you know, the regular business run for commerce--was robbed and the couriers murdered. Timothy Ring was convicted, but claimed he was framed by the co-conspirators.

Here's the case right here.  (click at left) The story is done by our fine AZ reporter Michael Kiefer, who also covered the Serial Shooter trial

And here's Timothy Ring himself:

Timothy Ring, death row


It will be very interesting to see how the Ring case affects the Casey Anthony case.

ADD: For even more about Michael Kiefer, click on this word.



Please visit the Bookstore tab above to browse  
Pssst! Going to jail, buying documents, and everything else it takes to get this kind of info for the blog takes time and money! Every time you make a purchase here, it helps me be able to do more for you!

Casey Anthony Discussion on FaceBook

Please join me on Facebook! We are continuing our Casey Anthony conversation from last night's show on KTAR, including a wee apology from me for something I said on the radio.

We'd love to have you. There are many, many foreign visitors to this blog--would really like to hear how the Casey Anthony case is playing in...Senegal, Ukraine, Iran, the Netherlands, Latvia and all those other fabulously interesting places you all come from. Just click on that link and join in, my page is public. Or friend me and stay around after we move on to the sweat lodge trial (coming up tomorrow/I am attending the trial).

Here's my bad how-could-I-be-that-clumsy moment from last night: I flushed my phone after my visit to the KTAR studios! So all the charming photos I took at KTAR are currently, um, unavailable. If they are ever recovered, I will post them.

If you missed parts of the show last night, let me tell you that top tier defense attorney Michael Kimerer weighed in and sounded very much like even he would have a hard time keeping her out of jail. Michael Kimerer has handled some of the biggest cases you've heard of, including the Baby Gabriel case and the Debra Milke appeals. Hey, if Michael Kimerer thinks your defense is so much phooey, you got problems!

Come on Facebook and tell me what you think......

p.s. click on the tag and see my other posts about Debra Milke and the Swiss documentary in which I appear.

Friday, June 24, 2011

Talk About Casey Anthony Case on KTAR Sunday Night--Join Me!

Casey Anthony Trial Update: Casey's brother takes stand after Cindy Anthony testimony

You're following the Casey Anthony trial, right? Who isn't!? Witty and thoughtful Jay Lawrence from KTAR Radio is. He's planning an interesting show on Sunday night (7p Arizona time). I'll be there and so will top tier defense attorney Michael Kimerer. Maybe Kimerer will shed some light for us on the defense strategy. In my own career, I remember Kimerer as the first attorney to start talking abut the problem of false confessions. By now, we all know they are a very real problem. But he was way ahead of the curve on this. This guy is very sharp and very interesting.

The finest coverage on these big cases, in my opinion, always comes from local sources. That's because the hometown reporters see details and connections and context that the national guys swooping in don't. There's none better than the Orlando Sentinel in the Casey Anthony case. The Sentinel's Anthony Colarossi will be joining Jay on Sunday night, too!

I'll be bringing my perspective as one who writes true crime books and attends murder trials all the time.

PHOTO:Â Cindy Anthony testifies on day 26 of Casey Anthony's 1st-degree murder trial at the Orange County Courthouse in Orlando, Fla. on June 23, 2011.

Was Cindy really the one to do computer searches for "chloroform?" Why was Lee cut out of the birth of the family's first grandchild? What about those handcuffs and the stolen credit cards on the night Caylee was finally reported missing?

Please join us. I look forward to this more than anybody. I can't wait to hear Michael Kimerer's insights and Anthony Colarossi's observations!

No matter where you are in the world, you can listen in because KTAR streams live. Go to KTAR.com and look for the blue "LIVE-NewsTalk" play arrow just to the left and below the big red KTAR sign at the center top of the home page. Listen in! Call in! Or if you can't make it, leave some questions and comments here below!

That's the Jay Lawrence Show:
  • KTAR.com
  • Sunday night 7pm Arizona time
  • Defense attorney Michael Kimerer
  • Orlando Sentinel reporter Anthony Colarossi
  • True Crime Author Camille Kimball

7 pm Arizona time is 10 pm New York time.


Jay Lawrence Show on KTAR



Tuesday, June 14, 2011

DNA, Executions and Casey Anthony's Prosecutor

If you are following the Casey Anthony trial, the tragic affair that ends in the discarded remains of two year old cherub Caylee Anthony, you have seen prosecutor Jeff Ashton at work.



Did you know he is credited with being the first prosecutor in the United States to use forensic DNA profiling in a criminal trial? It was 1988 and DNA was far from being the solid science we know and love today. It was still considered mumbo-jumbo by many, many people. Here is an archival New York Times article about new-fangled DNA, "young Jeff Ashton," and the beginning of a criminal court revolution.

Are you a fan of novelist Linda Fairstein? She is in this NYT article, too, still a NY prosecutor and hot on the trail of the incipient DNA juggernaut.


A few months later, in 1988, Ricky Bible snatched a little girl on her bike in Flagstaff, Arizona, a mountain town where her family was vacationing. She did not survive his attack. Ricky Bible became the first Arizona conviction based on DNA profiling. I remember the controversy at the time. This week Richard Bible has finally received an execution date. The little girl would have been 32 this year, but remains forever a third grader in the hearts of her loved ones.



Monday, June 13, 2011

The Face of Murder?

Betty Neumar  Special


This is a booking photo of a woman charged with murder. It's not every day we see 79 year old female murder suspects. Today, it seems, Betty Neumar went on to face Supreme Justice before coming to trial on Earth. Her family is reporting her death in North Carolina.

Betty Neumar was charged in the death of one husband, but at times there have suspicions that all five of her "better halves" were victims of her allegedly murderous ways.
http://chronicle.augusta.com/latest-news/2011-06-13/black-widow-suspect-betty-neumar-dies?v=1307983186


Superb true crime author Diane Fanning had been planning a book on the case. I'm very interested to read up on all the details. The question of whether or not a person, especially a woman, can get away with murder for a lifetime intrigues me very much. Female murderers, especially of the Black Widow type, often know just the right psychological tricks to get people to think of them as vulnerable and innocent, instead of dangerous and deceptive.

It will be awhile before Diane Fanning's book on this case comes out. In the meantime, why not pick up her book on the Casey Anthony case? Now is the perfect time, with trial on. You can read it quickly and get really grounded in the case while the lawyers are in endless sidebars.




Psssssst!

While you're at Amazon, why not drop by my books, too? You know Amazon is going to ask you to buy 1 or 2 more to get the good shipping deal, right? ;)

WHAT SHE ALWAYS WANTED

is about Marjorie Orbin. Her case was featured on CBS 48 Hours, "Diary of a Showgirl."

A SUDDEN SHOT
is about the killing spree of Dale Hausner, and the individual acts of heroism that defeated him.

Thursday, May 5, 2011

I Love to Say I Told You So (Casey Anthony case)

Please visit the Bookstore tab above to browse  
Pssst! Going to jail, buying documents, and everything else it takes to get this kind of info for the blog takes time and money! Every time you make a purchase here, it helps me be able to do more for you!

The post below is about the Casey Anthony case (young mother charged with murder of 2 year old) and how the judge in the case is trying to arm wrestle the media into submission.

As I predicted, the judge's actions have backfired. Some media are challenging him in court. Others, like hometown newspaper Orlando Sentinel, are picking up the gauntlet and flinging it back in his face, with a rapier edge slicing through the air as it flies. The Sentinel pointedly states that it will not sign the Austin Powers Super-decoder Secrecy Oath and therefore has no reason to join the appeal. They do, confidently and gleefully, mention they will pursue getting the information from other sources.

Let's see....there will be secretaries, janitors, clerks and, oh dear, lawyers involved in the information he's trying to keep hidden (he's trying to save himself a whole 12 hours????)....you think the Sentinel (and any number of other news outlets) will be able to suss out a weak link in the system?

Poor Judge Perry is turning this information into a prized plum that it doesn't merit being on its own. Jury selection is the most boring part of a trial, hands down. But he sprayed it with the glitter known as Authority Trampling on a Free Press and then taunted the tigers with it.

Tsk, tsk, tsk.

He should have just sealed the entire thing to all parties, without trying to entice in producers and editors with Such a Special Offer! like a used car salesman. If sealing the location was not an option available to him, he should just have sucked it up and dealt with the glorious free country he lives in. Would someone like InSession have done man-on-the-street interviews in that county? Possibly. But there are any number of remedies to discarding tainted and otherwise unacceptable potential jurors from the pool. That's what the questionnaires and voir dire are for.

Pssssst, let me lean in to whisper, your honor: lots of newspapers etc. would have found that story not worthy of resources. Plenty of them would have let the story die down for the few weeks it will take for jury selection and wait for opening arguments to rev up coverage again.

Alas, that blissful quiet time may be lost forever now, after the Double-Dawg Dare the media received from the bench.

The people who manipulate the media best are those who understand it. Judge Perry clearly doesn't understand reporters. Too bad he doesn't understand his First Amendment a little better, either.

Tuesday, May 3, 2011

Your Honor, I Object!

Please visit the Bookstore tab above to browse  
Pssst! Going to jail, buying documents, and everything else it takes to get this kind of info for the blog takes time and money! Every time you make a purchase here, it helps me be able to do more for you!


Anyone interested in the Casey Anthony case (young Florida mother accused of killing her 2 year old, Caylee), and most true crimers can't avoid following the case at least to some degree, will know that Judge Belvin Perry has been offering up his thoughts the last few days about "the media."

casey anthony, belvin perry


In solemn tones that barely conceal the steam coming out of his ears, Judge Perry tells us never in his thirty years has he seen such media coverage in a court case, it has certainly never happened in the State of Florida and it even "dwarfs" the O.J. Simpson trial. He goes on to say the media has "changed" and scolds the reporters and producers following Casey Anthony for their pursuit of "ratings" and other sins that seem more terrible than, well, murdering a bubbly little girl, stuffing her in a bag and tossing her into the neighborhood woods.

No one has more respect for the judiciary than do I, but this time, Judge Perry is showing his slip. Did he not notice a charming little Florida sideshow known as the Anna Nicole Smith case? That one had so much media interest the judge himself landed a reality TV show deal. Oh, gee, before that, we had an itty bitty custody dispute in Florida about a kindergartener named Elian. Seems to me a few reporters and cameras showed up for that one. Oh, who was that guy? (said in the voice of David Spade at his most sarcastic) He was known for being handsome? Oh, yeah. Ted was the guy's name. Ted Bundy. Seems he brought a bit of media attention to Florida.

That's just off the top of my head, but three cases should suffice to outshout Judge Perry's assertion about Florida cases so I'll move on.

It's nice that Judge Perry remembers O.J. Simpson, but did Scott Petersen slip his mind? Hollywood types like Robert Blake, Phil Spectre and Michael Jackson? Professional athletes Kobe Bryant, Michael Vick and Mike Tyson? College athletes from the Duke LaCrosse team? I'm getting tired of all these cases from Judge Perry's own lifetime (adult life, at that) that keep popping into my head. I'm going to move on again.

The judge says the media has "changed" and apparently, lost some sort of moral restraint he believes it once had that conformed with his own idea of how reporters should behave.

Hmmmm.....in the 1930s, the case of "trunk murderess" Winnie Ruth Judd created a vortex of media melodrama, using cutthroat and under the table tactics that would make most of today's reporters blush.

http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/.a/6a00d8341c630a53ef011570af7d02970b-pi
(archive newspaper above from 1931)

And then there's the Lindbergh baby, Lizzie Borden, Cinque,* and on and on and on through this nation's history and far back into Europe's history as well.

Judge Perry, you see, named his own blindspot when he kept saying never in "my" court, "my" career, and "my" experience. He finds the media attention alarming because he, personally, has never been closely involved with it. He erroneously concludes neither has anyone else.

But if you are a professional reporter, instead of a professional jurist, your perspective is vastly different. You know this kind of media attention happens constantly. You know the world not only continues to spin on its axis, it thrives on the fresh air. It's actually one of the things that makes this country special. We don't have star chambers here, we have a free press. And, thank heaven, we have a citizenry that is interested in the judicial system and engaged in the public dialogue. Your honor, media interest--and, by proxy, that of their readers/viewers/listeners--is a sign of good things, not bad.

The fact that Casey Anthony deserves due process is not in conflict with this. It is the court's job to give her due process, not some just out of college producer's at InSession TV. In order to put this burden on all the interns, producers, beat reporters and columnists covering the trial, Judge Perry has crafted a fancy little magic trick involving special conditions and blackmail. When the smoke clears from this sleight of hand, gosh, the trained dove fluttering away looks a lot like "prior restraint" and other unsavory things we usually feel are assaults on the U.S. constitution. I have a hard time understanding how protecting Casey Anthony's rights needs to be done at the expense of those of the the press. The Bill of Rights makes it clear, and wisely so, that kings and dukes and parliaments are not to stop American citizens from finding out what's going in the world and that the press is the agent of the free flow of information.

The judge is concerned about the jury pool for Casey Anthony's trial. That's as it should be. Here's a little secret, your honor, most of the press would be relieved if it were taken out of their hands. The jury isn't the story, Casey and Caylee are. If some want to put endless resources into pursuing the info, that's their problem. The stories will be limp and self-limiting. You'll get your "unsaturated" jury.

Simply seal the location of the jury selection. Apply the seal to all parties. Don't give special cutesy passes to those who agree to sign special made-in-the-treehouse-pinkie-swear-cross-my-heart documents.

But it's too late for that. You've thrown down the gauntlet. Now you've got newsroom lawyers clustered in New York and Atlanta weighing the pros and cons of signing the pirate's oath and fighting it in court later. Chances are good they'd win.

But, for heaven's sake, Judge Perry, at least stop thinking of Casey Anthony as so special. On the other coast, ask Lindsay Lohan's judge how many reporters are interested in that case. Look up the cases I've cited here, then remind yourself of dozens and dozens more. No, Casey is not special. The right of due process afforded to defendants in this country, however, is. But, your honor, please don't forget that so is our free press.



*For a quick look at Cinque and how he became a media darling in pre-Civil War America, take a look at Chapter 12 of my book, A SUDDEN SHOT: THE PHOENIX SERIAL SHOOTER.