tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7961681502337822401.post8065718771981433742..comments2024-02-13T05:22:51.497-08:00Comments on CAMILLE KIMBALL: Confessions of a Slightly Famous Crime Writer: Reporter's Notebook on Elizabeth Johnson Case CamilleKimballhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14896253762859151536noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7961681502337822401.post-86288911351338556992012-10-17T12:15:32.261-07:002012-10-17T12:15:32.261-07:00OH my second part was supposed to focus on her att...OH my second part was supposed to focus on her attorney's insistence that EJ told fabrications in defense of the conspiracy charge acquittal. If her statements were UNTRUE....then the conspiracy charge should be dropped. Well even in the world of "make believe" you have to be consistent to win an argument...EITHER EJ Johnson is TRUSTWORTH and TRUTHFUL [hence the acquittal in the Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7961681502337822401.post-29154006464842323682012-10-17T10:31:38.021-07:002012-10-17T10:31:38.021-07:00I also found, yesterdy, the defense's closing ...I also found, yesterdy, the defense's closing to be inconsistent. On a particular count he would argue that EJ's statements were statements of fact or truth and therefore an acquittal on that count is neccessary. For example...he wants the jury to conclude that EJ is not guilty of Kidnapping bc no "physical" restraint occurred lol AND EJ's statments to Logan were relayed inAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7961681502337822401.post-1949871653391186422012-10-16T08:28:24.571-07:002012-10-16T08:28:24.571-07:00You're right, Remarkaboi, it's all about t...You're right, Remarkaboi, it's all about the technicalities. I personally have never seen a "no defense presented" case work, but good luck to him. With motions to the judge, he might gain some ground. I hate to second-guess juries, but in this case looks like I'm willing to break my own rule. Without being given some reason to feel sorry for her or see things from her CamilleKimballhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14896253762859151536noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7961681502337822401.post-89064324038651563512012-10-02T15:41:36.798-07:002012-10-02T15:41:36.798-07:00After today's testimony and cross examination ...After today's testimony and cross examination from the defense....He is actually persuing a strategy of technicalities. From his line of questioning...he elicits answers to to questions that create a UNKNOWABLE answer; is the child dead or alive...if the answer is "I don't know, or I can't say;......HE wants the jury to acquit solely bc they don't have the answer. "If Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7961681502337822401.post-57628997493304457032012-10-02T13:16:56.403-07:002012-10-02T13:16:56.403-07:00Her attorney's argument is fatally flawed. I ...Her attorney's argument is fatally flawed. I think the jury, at this time, can/will assume that Baby Gabriel was never found...for the mere fact that the jurors listened to the audio interview by the local journalist in the presence of the Smiths the male LEO. In that very interview she could not state that she knew her baby was safe and sound...nor could she articulate WHO the adoptive Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com